Our Influence

Judges, Legislators, Advocates and Scholars Worldwide Have Cited Our Work.
 

LEGISLATORS

 
Parliament of Victoria (Australia) Reform Committee:
Criminal Liability for Self-Induced Intoxication Report (May 1999)
 

SCHOLARLY ARTICLES / TEXTBOOKS & TREATISES

  • 113 Harvard Law Review 413
  • 109 West Virginia Law Review 257
  • 109 West Virginia Law Review 357
  • 91 Boston University Law Review 1597
  • 91 Nebraska Law Review 502
  • 87 California Law Review 943
  • 64 Maryland Law Review 1098
  • 64 Missouri Law Review 383
  • 55 Vanderbilt Law Review 607
  • 48 Criminal Law Bulletin 956
  • 45 William & Mary Law Review 675
  • 40 California Western Law Review 407
  • 39 Connecticut Law Review
  • 36 American Criminal Law Review 1203
  • 35 Stetson Law Review 1001
  • 34 University of Memphis Law Review 753
  • 34 William Mitchell Law Review 1517
  • 33 Law & Water Law Review 749
  • 28 Psychology of Women Quarterly 323
  • 27 Behavioral Sciences and the Law 237
  • 27 Justice Quarterly 517
  • 24 Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology 129
  • 18 Journal of Interpersonal Violence 813
  • 14 William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 475
  • 13 New Criminal Law Review 555
  • 12 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 739
  • 7 Wyoming Law Review 1

Maryland Supreme Court

Bazzle v. State
(2012) 426 Md. 541 [45 A.3d 166]

Harrison v. State (2004)
382 Md. 477 [855 A.2d 1220]

 

Wisconsin Supreme Court

State v. Henning (2004)
273 Wisc. 352 [681 N.W.2d 871]

 

Oregon Court of Appeals

State v. Dasa (2010)
234 Or.App. 219 [227 P.3d 228]



Paul H. Robinson, Criminal Law: Case Studies and Controversies
 
Joshua Dressler, Cases and Materials on Criminal Law
 
Wayne LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law
 
Dolch, Deutschmann & Wise (2007) Social Problems: A Case Study Approach

  • 1 Witkin California Criminal Law 4th Elements § 13, In General
  • 1 Witkin California Criminal Law 4th Defenses § 208, Doctrine in Criminal Cases
  • 1 Witkin California Criminal Law 4th Elements § 57, Requirement of Specific Intent
  • 1 Witkin California Criminal Law 4th Crimes Against the Person § 105, Qualifying States of Mind
  • 3 Am.Jur. Proof of Facts 2d 551, Homicide Outside of Common Design
  • 5 Am.Jur. Proof of Facts 2d 189, Lack of Capacity to Form Specific Intent
  • 8 Am.Jur. Proof of Facts 2d 231, Withdrawal from or Abandonment of Criminal Enterprise
  • 51 A.L.R.6th 139, Application of Apprendi v. New Jersey 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 430 (2004).

Appellate Law case evaluation At Keiter Appellate Law, we offer a free consultation during which we will examine the facts of your case and advise you on how best to proceed. *ALL FIELDS ARE REQUIRED